Headlines: Harvesting Earth’s Infrared Energy Proposed by Harvard Physicists

March 19, 2014 – The solar radiation that strikes Earth warms it when compared to the surrounding vacuum of space and most of it we lose as it bounces right back out. If we could harvest the radiation in the form of infrared emissions the difference between the warm Earth and colder space could answer the world’s power needs once and for all.

 

Infrared glow of heat from Earth emitted to space

 

In a paper entitled Harvesting renewable energy from Earth’s mid-infrared emissions, published in the March Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, just such a scheme is proposed through the creation of an emissive energy harvester (EEH). This would be an energy creating device capable of converting the wasted heat that bleeds from our atmosphere into space. It amounts to 100 million Gigawatts per second. The EEH would convert this heat imbalance into direct-current (DC) power.

Two schemes are proposed:

 

  • A thermal EEH which would operate in a similar manner to solar thermal power generators.
  • An optoelectronic EEH which would operate like a solar photovoltaic power generator in reverse using an infrared-frequency rectifying antenna or rectenna.

 

Whether thermal or optoelectronic the EEH would be an emitter rather than a receiver. The thermal EEH would act like a hot plate radiating energy to a cold plate which would lie on top of it facing the sky. The radiated heat energy would amount to a few watts per square meter and would be generated continuously, day or night.

The optoelectronic EEH would consist of nanoscale electronic components, tiny infrared-harvesting rectennas laminated onto a solar panel which each individually would generate a tiny amount of current and collectively could produce massive amounts of energy. Recent advances in plasmonics (the oscillation of electrons between two materials) using graphene makes this latter option potentially feasible.

What’s holding us back from building this type of energy generating source? We need to do more experimentation with nanomaterials to get just the right ones to optimize the energy we generate. And we need to develop a class of diodes in rectennas that can switch on and off 30 trillion times a second. A schematic of what one of these resistor generator circuits looks like can be seen below.

 

Rectenna schematic for harvesting infrared energy

 


Len Rosen lives in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. He is a researcher and writer who has a fascination with science and technology. He is married with a daughter who works in radio, and a miniature red poodle who is his daily companion on walks of discovery. More...

Advertisement

  • Al Gage

    The Stefan-Boltzmann Law (sometimes called Stefan’s Law), states that the energy radiated by a blackbody is directly proportional to the fourth power of the body’s absolute temperature. Given the apparent inviolability of Stefan’s Law, schemes that attempt to harness weak radiation from relatively cool bodies (the earth) will always prove economically inferior to schemes that attempt to harness energy from much warmer bodies (the sun). Trying to capture the earth’s weak thermal radiation (only a couple of Watts per square meter contrasted with the sun’s some 1300 Watts of radiation) just sounds goofy to me. One might just as well try to capture the Moon’s infrared radiation. One minute of direct sunlight supplies roughly as much energy per unit of collector surface as ten hours of Earth’s radiation. No scheme can capture energy that just isn’t there. So large surface area collectors would be needed to capture relatively small amounts of energy from the earth’s thermal radiation. If we are going to have large surface area collectors, why not aim them at the sun and obtain 250 times as much energy per unit of area? The whole concept of rectifying thermal noise to create electrical potential, what an ideal gadget, has been studied exhaustively, and found to be non-competitive. There are good reason NASA powers its innerplanet spacecraft with photovoltaic panels and not radioisotope thermoelectric generators. The pure physics argues much higher conversion efficiency per unit of weight in photovoltaics. But at great distances from the sun, there is little solar radition to harvest, so the radioisotope thermoelectric generators becomes the most practical choice.

    To obtain useful energy near the Earth’s orbit by harvesting radiation, it’s the Sun’s radiation, not the Earth’s, that by far makes the most sense.