No One Should Think That Money Spent on NASA is a Waste

September 16, 2014 – One of my readers shared the following infographic called NASA Spinning Off Since 1962. It highlights the inventions, discoveries and economic return on investment resulting from NASA.  For every dollar invested by the government the American economy and other countries economies have seen $7 to $14 in new revenue, all from spinoffs and licensing arrangements. That amounts to in $17.6 billion current NASA dollars spent to an economic boost worth as much as $246.4 billion annually.

From the Black & Decker cordless vacuum, the Dustbuster, to ear thermometers and memory foam, we clean, check our temperature and get a good night sleep, here on Earth, on NASA-licensed spinoff technologies.

The winglet found on the wingtips of commercial aircraft today, an invention to reduce drag and improve fuel efficiency, came from NASA. Orthodontists use a translucent material called TPA for invisible braces – invented at NASA for an entirely different purpose. Farmers are using field sensors that tell them when their crops need watering – invented at NASA.

The list goes on and on.

Of course the downside to this argument is would the money spent elsewhere have yielded an equal if not greater return? Those who question NASA’s value point to the commercial spinoffs coming from research and technology investments through DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.

DARPA’s annual budget today amounts to $2.8 billion USD, one-sixth NASA spending. DARPA inventions include a long list of pretty impressive commercial inventions and spinoffs. Here are the top 4 in my book – the Internet, GPS, 3D mapping, and virtual personal assistants like Siri in the Apple iPhone.

Of course DARPA technology didn’t deliver the first human to step on the Moon, and the International Space Station. And DARPA didn’t create the amazing technology that includes robotic rovers and spacecraft which send us pictures of Saturn’s astounding rings and moons, and desolate Martian landscapes. The investment in NASA may cost more but in my book it’s worth it.


NASA Spinning Off Since 1962

Len Rosen lives in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. He is a researcher and writer who has a fascination with science and technology. He is married with a daughter who works in radio, and a miniature red poodle who is his daily companion on walks of discovery.


  • Pingback: Humans to Mars – For and against | Michael Dello()

  • Pingback: Quora()

  • Pingback: LoSboccacc comments on "Findings from 15 years of the International Space Station"()

  • Pingback: Humans to Mars – For and against – Michael Dello-Iacovo()

  • Pingback: Quora()

  • Pingback: economic-of-space – Brian Grefenstette()

  • Pingback: Quora()

  • Pingback: Quick Fact: For every dollar spent on NASA there is an average... - Quick Facts()

  • Chris Balbi

    I’d totally be careful of your URL’s I went to copy / paste it, and the display URL makes it seem like this article is about how much money is wasted on Nasa ” Money, Spent, Nasa, Waste” (

    • lenrosen4

      Hi Chris, I’m trying to understand your comment. Which URL are you talking about? The posting includes an infographic that shows the ROI gained from NASA research. I also include two related articles, one describing NASA-inspired technology we use in our homes and lives every day, and another listing 20 things we have because of NASA.

      • Chris Balbi

        Hi I’m referring to “”

        when I pasted the URL to source a comment on Facebook, someone replied saying “oh, so that link states that “money-spent-nasa-waste” … does that mean money spent on nasa is a waste?

        i told them it was just the URL and that the article is the opposite of that.

        • lenrosen4

          I see what you mean. I work in WordPress and I gather it created that contracted URL name that suggests the exact opposite of the article. You are right.

        • lenrosen4

          I have changed the URL to:

          Thanks for pointing this out.


  • Pingback: Economic Benefits of NASA | Should WE fund NASA?()

  • moonwatcher2001

    I have heard in popular literature, that sometime in the 1970s a study was done by the OMB or CBO that indicated our economy had received about seven dollars or so for every dollar we had invested in our space program up through most of Project Apollo.

    Is there a link to this study or can it be downloaded? I would like to present it to those who claim money spent on space exploration is a waste.

    • lenrosen4

      Wikipedia references an MRIGlobal study from November 1971. There is a 1976 Chase Econometrics study. The only CBO study I have seen was done in the George W. Bush era. The references appear in the “Budget of NASA” posting in Wikipedia.